Work / SereniBrain

From session viewer to practice coach

The hardware is finished. The opportunity is the app.

Product Design· Research· UI· Self-initiated · 2026

SereniBrain ships a brain-sensing meditation wearable with a companion app that records everything and reveals almost nothing. This concept redesign turns the data the device already captures into the product's real value, and its strongest, lowest-cost growth lever.

Before and after of the SereniBrain home screen. Before: a session viewer with a brain-computer interface explainer carousel, a meditation tracker, and group meditation. After: a Settle Forecast that says it is a strong window to sit, with streak, typical settle time, average deep calm, and a when-you-go-deep weekly heatmap.
SereniBrain home · before and after

01  The problem

An insight-poor app on great hardware.

SereniBrain's engineering gravity sits where you'd expect for a neurotech startup: the EEG headband. Dry electrodes, signal processing, brainwave classification. That is the moat, and it is genuinely good.

The companion app, by contrast, behaves like a data read-out for the hardware rather than a product in its own right.

What the app shows todayWhat a daily practitioner wants
One score per sit (33 · Poor) and a Calm / Relaxed / Active donut
Am I getting better, settling faster, over weeks?
A live state curve, shown once, then forgotten
When do I practice best, and why?
Past sessions listed as durations, no trend, no comparison
What's my minimum effective dose?
An Export button as the only path to the bigger picture
Is today a good day to push for depth?

Every one of those questions spans many sessions. The app only ever shows one.

A spreadsheet of exported SereniBrain session data, with columns for calm, relaxed, and active state percentages and brainwave bands across dozens of sessions
To answer those questions myself, I exported four spreadsheets and roughly 400 MB of raw samples (brainwave voltages logged every 80 ms) and wrote my own analysis. The data was rich, longitudinal, beautifully sampled. It was simply trapped one layer below the surface.

02  Context of use

I designed for the moment, not the metric.

I grounded the redesign in three months of real, continuous practice (59 device-recorded sits plus a daily reflection journal) and, just as importantly, in the situation those sits happen in. Studying the context of use, not just the numbers, is what reframed the whole product.

Cross-session

The questions that matter only exist across time. A per-session donut is the wrong unit of analysis for a habit.

The groggy morning

Use is a ritual: same window, before the day starts. The app is opened pre-coffee, eyes barely open, so the first screen has to do the thinking.

Pre and post

Meaning is made in the two minutes around the sit, setting an intention, then reflecting. The data should meet the user there.

Felt, not read

Practitioners already journal mood and body state. That context predicts a sit better than the sensor alone, but the app never asks for it.

Average calm by day of week, reconstructed from the export

30
M
54
T
45
W
25
T
58
F
45
S
37
S

Thursdays are tough. Depth varies sharply by day, a pattern that is invisible in a session-at-a-time view.

The insight wasn't in the numbers. It was in realising where, when, and how groggy the person reading them would be.

03  The reframe

Same data, a different job.

Before, a session viewer: it grades the last sit and waits to be exported. After, a practice coach: it remembers, compares, and tells you what to do next, in your own context. Four principles, each a direct answer to a context-of-use finding.

01

Surface what you already capture

No new sensors. Compute settle-time, trends, and best-window from data already logged. The lowest-lift, highest-value move in the product.

02

Compare me to my own baseline

"52% calm" is noise. "Above your 42% average" is feedback. Every number is framed against the user's own history.

03

One number that matters

Lead with time-to-settle, the metric tied to the user's actual goal (deep absorption, faster), not an opaque 0 to 100 score.

04

Capture context at the moment of use

A two-tap pre-sit check-in closes the loop the journal was already trying to close, and makes every later insight sharper.

04  The redesign

Four screens, built around the moment.

The home up top is the headline move: a Settle Forecast, not a feed. Opened groggy, it does the thinking and answers whether today is a good day to go deep. Three more screens carry the rest of the job.

Insights · the cross-session view

The tab the product never had

A time-to-settle trend (honestly flat, framed as the user's next frontier), a best-window heatmap, and plain-language cards: arriving alert is your number-one driver, Thursdays are tough, your sweet spot is about 20 minutes. A weekly digest turns three months of buried export into a Sunday-night read.

Session report · from grade to feedback

A grade becomes a conversation

The old screen delivered a bare "33 · Poor" and a donut. The redesign opens with a plain-language headline, then three numbers that each compare to the user's baseline, and ends with a one-line reflection prompt. The critical fix: sessions are labelled Seated or Nidra, so a restful practice is no longer mis-scored as a failed focus session.

Before
The old SereniBrain session report: a Performance Score of 33 labelled Poor in a donut with calm, relaxed, and active percentages, and a practice state curve.
After
The redesigned SereniBrain session report: a plain-language headline reading one of your deepest sits, three numbers compared to baseline, a session flow curve, and a brain-state band.

Pre-sit check-in · the one new input

The highest-ROI two taps in the app

Before starting: how are you arriving (alert, neutral, sleepy) and which practice. This is the only added data capture in the whole redesign, and the most valuable, because arrival state predicted depth better than any sensor signal. The tip box coaches from the user's own history, nudging away from "Hard" mode, which measurably lowered their calm.

05  The business case

The cheapest growth lever they're not pulling.

Hardware is a one-time sale with thin margins and a returns risk. The app is where a neurotech brand earns recurring revenue, retention, and word of mouth, and SereniBrain is under-investing in exactly the layer that compounds. The redesign is attractive precisely because the hard part is already done.

A premium "Insights+" tier

Single-session feedback stays free; trends, best-window, forecasts, weekly digests, and unlimited history become a low-cost subscription. The asset already exists in the export, it just isn't packaged or priced.

Retention and engagement

A coach that gives a reason to open the app before every sit, plus a streak and forecast to protect, lifts session frequency and cuts the churn that quietly kills wearables after the novelty fades.

Shareable insight as free acquisition

"My brain settles 40% faster on Fridays" is screenshot-worthy in a way a donut never is. Personal-progress cards turn users into a marketing channel for the hardware.

Higher perceived hardware value

When the band visibly makes you better over time, the purchase feels justified. Insight reduces buyer's remorse, protecting the core hardware revenue directly.

Every feature here is computed from data already collected. No new hardware, no new sensors, no ML retraining. The lift is design surface area, not R&D, which puts the whole redesign in the rare low-effort, high-impact quadrant.

Note: the revenue and retention framing above is stated as opportunity hypotheses to be validated, not measured results from a shipped product.

06  Reflection

What context of use taught me.

The most useful move in this project wasn't analysing brainwaves. It was asking who is reading this, when, and in what state. The same dataset that produces an intimidating 400 MB export becomes a calm, two-line morning nudge once you design for the moment instead of the metric.

If I took this further

  • Usability test the groggy-morning home with real practitioners: is the forecast trusted or ignored?
  • Validate the forecast model against held-out sessions before promising it on the home screen.
  • Instrument and A/B the pre-sit check-in: does context capture actually improve perceived insight?
  • Price-test Insights+ and measure its effect on 90-day retention.

What I'd carry forward

  • Lead with the one metric tied to the user's goal, not the one the device finds easiest to output.
  • Frame every number against the user's own baseline.
  • Treat recurring software value as part of a hardware product's business model, not an afterthought.
  • Design the moment of use, then let the data serve it.

Good data is necessary. Knowing the situation it lands in is what makes it useful.

Concept · self-initiated · 2026

See the rest of my work.

View all work